Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between of NOVA groups (in g/d) and breast cancer risk, overall and by breast cancer subtypes

From: Degree of food processing and breast cancer risk: a prospective study in 9 European countries

Breast cancer subtypes

N Cases

NOVA 1

NOVA 2

NOVA 3

NOVA 4

HR per 1 SD (95%CI)a

Phomogeneity

HR per 1 SD (95%CI)a

Phomogeneity

HR per 1 SD (95%CI)a

Phomogeneity

HR per 1 SD (95%CI)a

Phomogeneity

Overall

14,933

0.99 (0.97-1.01)

 

1.01 (0.98-1.03)

 

1.05 (1.03-1.07)

 

1.01 (0.99-1.03)

 

In situ

1603

0.97 (0.91-1.04)

0.63

1.00 (0.94-1.07)

0.87

1.01 (0.96-1.07)

0.18

1.01 (0.99-1.03)

0.87

Invasive

13,320

0.99 (0.97-1.01)

 

1.01 (0.98-1.03)

 

1.05 (1.03-1.07)

 

1.01 (0.95-1.07)

 

Invasive ER+

7789

0.99 (0.96-1.02)

0.54

1.00 (0.97-1.03)

0.29

1.06 (1.04-1.08)

0.86

1.00 (0.98-1.03)

0.11

Invasive ER-

1736

1.01 (0.95-1.07)

 

1.04 (0.98-1.10)

 

1.06 (1.01-1.11)

 

1.06 (1.00-1.11)

 

Invasive PR+

5268

0.99 (0.96-1.03)

0.56

1.01(0.98-1.04)

0.34

1.05 (1.03-1.08)

0.51

0.99 (0.95-1.02)

0.15

Invasive PR-

2726

0.98 (0.93-1.03)

 

0.98 (0.93-1.03)

 

1.07 (1.03-1.11)

 

1.03 (0.98-1.09)

 

Invasive HER2+

901

0.99 (0.91-1.08)

0.97

1.00 (0.92-1.09)

0.70

1.04 (0.98-1.12)

0.57

1.04 (0.97-1.13)

0.39

Invasive HER2-

3676

0.99 (0.95-1.03)

 

1.02 (0.98-1.06)

 

1.07 (1.03-1.10)

 

1.01 (0.97-1.03)

 
  1. CI Confidence Interval, ER Estrogen Receptor, HER2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, HR Hazard ratio, NOVA 1 unprocessed/minimally processed foods, NOVA 2 Processed culinary ingredients, NOVA 3 Processed foods, NOVA 4 Ultra-processed foods, PR Progesterone receptor, SD Standard deviation
  2. aModels were stratified by age and center and adjusted for education, height, physical activity, age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, age at first full-term pregnancy, parity, breastfeeding, menopausal status and menopausal hormone therapy use. Each NOVA group was mutually adjusted for the other NOVA groups